Well
I’ve been saying since the last election that the NDP surge in Quebec
was a protest vote against the three other options and that seems to
have been borne out by events last night. The NDP is back to where they
always have been, as are the Liberals and Conservatives. But I worry
that the majority means that there is just more trouble ahead for
Canada’s left. It will be nice to have four solid years of a government
it’s likely I’ll mostly agree with, but I wonder what opportunities have
been lost because it’s a majority.
First,
there will be no merger of the parties of the left. The Liberals have
no interest in that now. I also wonder if the majority situation will
end the prospect of a move towards proportional representation before
the next election. If it had been a minority Liberal government, or
especially a minority Conservative one that was toppled by the second
and third place parties, I think the prospect of a move to proportional
representation would have been greater. There would have been a much
stronger desire to entrench the left wing majority, and the best way to
do that would have been to change the system. Now that the Liberals got a
large majority with only 40% of the vote, it doesn’t really seem like
it’s in their interest to switch to a system that would give them only
40% of the seats. In fact it would probably be less in reality as many
people who voted Liberal this election would be more inclined to vote
NDP or Green in a proportional representation situation.
If
I thought that the Liberal support would be consistent in the next
election, I might not be so worried. 8 years is a long time to make
positive changes and see them borne out. But I think so much of the
Liberal support this election came from people who rallied to them
simply in order to oust Harper. That isn’t going to be a factor in the
next election and 4 years of actual governing can do a lot of damage to
people’s dreams. Long enough to start change, not long enough to see it
through.
1 comment:
Well I’ve been saying since the last election that the NDP surge in Quebec was a protest vote against the three other options and that seems to have been borne out by events last night.
It wasn't just Quebec though, it was also some of the big ridings in the GTA, no? Partly, I think it was also that the 'left' prefers a charismatic leaders, and the Layton was obviously much better than Ignatieff.
I think the prospect of a move to proportional representation would have been greater. There would have been a much stronger desire to entrench the left wing majority, and the best way to do that would have been to change the system. Now that the Liberals got a large majority with only 40% of the vote, it doesn’t really seem like it’s in their interest to switch to a system that would give them only 40% of the seats.
That's probably true, sadly. I'm not sure that PR is the solution to the electoral problem, but it would be an improvement. My naive by optimistic self would like to believe that the LPC can do a NPV calculation, and decide that PR would be an improvement for Canada: at least they wouldn't be ostracized from power:
1984 30/282=10% seats w/ 28% of the vote
2011 34/308=11% seats w/ 18% of the vote
Post a Comment